The patch we were using comes from the time during dualboot support development
where said feature was selectable at build time. The patch adds a new build
option, giving the impression that it only gets enabled under certain
circumstances, when in reality:
* The option is never enabled anywhere in our code
* It's a string option that is treated like a boolean, meaning its
respective conditional compilation is always getting compiled even when
disabled
Our current dualboot support is enabled at runtime, so it doesn't make sense to
have a build-time option related to it, especially one that's broken. Replace
the patch with a functionally equivalent one that is less confusing. Also,
remove the related config option from our defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Valcazar <gabriel.valcazar@digi.com>
We were using the .cfg suffix for both the build-time config fragments and the
runtime configuration file. During do_configure(), all files in SRC_URI ending
in .cfg were being merged together to create the final build configuration,
including said runtime file, which has a completely different syntax. In most
cases, the contents of this file were being ignored, but when tweaking
swupdate's configuration and re-building the package, sometimes strange errors
would prevent the build from finishing.
Change the runtime file's suffix entirely to separate it from the config
fragments and prevent it from being treated as such, and reflect the name
change in the defconfig and the recovery script.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Valcazar <gabriel.valcazar@digi.com>
Commit 429125cce0 created a minimal version 'defconfig'
that doesn't include all the default configuration options
of swupdate.
However, an anonymous python function inside the swupdate
repository establishes dependencies basing on configuration
switches it finds (or not) in the 'defconfig' file and any
additional configuration fragments.
For this reason, a minimal 'defconfig' cannot be used in
this recipe and a full configuration file (that also includes
default options) must be used instead.
Reported-by: Stephan Klatt
Signed-off-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Viguera <javier.viguera@digi.com>
The 'RDIFF' handler allows to apply incremental updates using rdiff delta files in the
swu update package. This functionallity is only recommended for read-only file systems,
where the source partition cannot be modified externally by users.
https://onedigi.atlassian.net/browse/DEL-8624
Signed-off-by: David Escalona <david.escalona@digi.com>
Make the 'defconfig' file a real defconfig by including only differences with respect default
values. While on it, improve the recipe:
- Enable 'BOOTLOADERHANDLER' by default in the 'defconfig'. We were unconditionally setting
this value to 'y' in the recipe, so move it to the default configuration.
- Move 'UBI' configuration values to 'mtd.cfg' file to be added only when device filesystem is
MTD based. Until now, 'UBI' support was always added by default.
- Move the 'SIGNED_IMAGES' configuration entry to a '.cfg' file like we are doing with the rest
of the functionallity. Use 'oe.utils.conditional' checking 'TRUSTFENCE' feature for this.
Signed-off-by: David Escalona <david.escalona@digi.com>
- The 'sign/verify' feature of swupdate can only be enabled/disabled at
compile time, it cannot be configured at run time.
- The 'sign/verify' defconfig file is only used when the images to
build are configured with 'TRUSTFENCE_SIGN=1'
- This change implies that all swupdate packages generated will have a
hash for the images to install and will be verified. Sign support is
only enabled for trustfence images.
https://jira.digi.com/browse/DEL-3773
Signed-off-by: David Escalona <david.escalona@digi.com>
There is new functionality in that version that we need for our firmware
update solution, so append the git-based recipe and set the revision to
the 2016.10 version.
Also provide a customized build configuration file. Notice that the
defconfig file is actually a full '.config'. It needs to be a full
config file because otherwise the anonymous python function in the
recipe is not able to gather all the build time dependences.
https://jira.digi.com/browse/DEL-3355
Signed-off-by: Javier Viguera <javier.viguera@digi.com>