Instead of having the whole recipe in meta-digi-arm, use the original
recipe in meta-fsl-arm and just add a bbappend file with some overrides.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
Instead of having the whole recipe in meta-digi-arm, use the original
recipe in meta-fsl-arm and just add a bbappend file with some overrides.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
Instead of having the whole recipe in meta-digi-arm, use the original
recipe in meta-fsl-arm and just add a bbappend file with some overrides.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
Instead of having the whole recipe in meta-digi-arm, use the original
recipe in meta-fsl-arm and just add a bbappend file with some overrides.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
Instead of having the whole recipe in meta-digi-arm, use the original
recipe in meta-fsl-arm and just add a bbappend file with some overrides.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
The package was not including all the libraries being installed.
That is because $SOLIBS extens to *.so.*, which meant that the .so files
were not being packaged.
I won't report this upstream as probably the source tarball they use won't
have this problem.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
The recipe is sourcing the tarball from Logroño's repoes which has a
different checksum than the same version included in meta-fsl-arm.
Go guess.
Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <alex.gonzalez@digi.com>
Alex Gonzalez